Enterprise robotic platform for AI-assisted can… — Enterprise Case Study

ENTERPRISE · enterprise platforms · medical robotics · AI systems · regulated products · scalable medical infrastructure

← All cases

Problem context

Colonoscopy procedures remain expensive, time-consuming, and operationally constrained, limiting screening capacity and delaying early cancer detection. Existing solutions focus on incremental device improvements but fail to address the systemic bottlenecks: procedure throughput, cleaning overhead, operator fatigue, and cost structure. The client's objective was not to build a single medical device, but to architect a scalable medical platform capable of transforming colonoscopy into a more efficient, accessible, and economically sustainable clinical service.

Constraints

  • Highly regulated medical environment with multi-market approval requirements
  • Need for both reusable capital equipment and single-use patient-contact components
  • Complex mechatronic system requiring synchronized control of movement, sensing, and visualization
  • Integration of AI-assisted control while preserving clinician oversight
  • Clear path to manufacturing scale and recurring revenue
  • Long-term platform extensibility beyond initial product version

Engineering decisions

Decision: Architect the solution as a platform rather than a standalone device
Reason: Long-term value is created through a combination of capital equipment, disposables, and software services.
Trade-off: Higher upfront system complexity and cross-disciplinary coordination.
Decision: Separate reusable core system from disposable patient-contact components
Reason: Eliminates cleaning downtime, reduces infection risk, and enables predictable per-procedure economics.
Trade-off: Requires rigorous cost optimization of single-use elements.
Decision: Implement AI-assisted robotic control as a supervised system
Reason: Automation reduces operator fatigue and variability while preserving clinical accountability.
Trade-off: Additional validation and regulatory complexity.
Decision: Design regulatory strategy in parallel with system architecture
Reason: Platform scalability depends on early alignment with FDA, Health Canada, and EU MDR pathways.
Trade-off: Increased documentation and process overhead during early phases.

System overview

The resulting platform consists of a robotic core device responsible for controlled navigation and actuation; disposable external components designed for single-use procedures; integrated sensing and imaging modules providing real-time clinical feedback; an AI-assisted control layer supporting automated movement and decision support; and a software and data layer enabling analytics, updates, and future service expansion. The architecture supports both clinical performance and operational scalability, allowing healthcare providers to increase throughput while reducing per-procedure cost.

Outcome

Validated prototype demonstrating robotic navigation and control feasibility. Proven separation of reusable and disposable subsystems. Manufacturing cost targets aligned with competitive procedure economics. Defined regulatory roadmap across multiple markets. Platform-ready architecture supporting future product iterations and service layers.

Engagement delivered under NDA. Details anonymized.